A critical review is the summarization and evaluation of the ideas and information in an article. It expresses the writer’s (your) point of view in the light of what you already know on the subject and what is acquired from related texts. Reviewing critically means thinking carefully and clearly and taking into consideration both the sample critical review Yen Nguyen The last 20 years have seen a revolution in the way we communicate, all brought about by the quite extraordinary developments that have occurred in the field of information and communications technologies CRITICAL EVALUATION OF A PUBLISHED PAPER The objective of this exercise is to evaluate your abilities to critically assess a published paper in Pharmacology. Each one of you will be given copies of the same publication. You will be expected to read the paper carefully and write a
How to review a paper | Science | AAAS
A critical review of a journal article evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of an article's ideas and content. It provides description, analysis and interpretation that allow readers to assess the article's value. Read over your notes. Choose a statement that expresses the central purpose or thesis of your review.
When thinking of a thesis, consider the author's intentions and whether or not you think those intentions were successfully realized. Eliminate all notes that do not relate to your thesis. Organize your remaining points into separate groups such as points about structure, style, or argument.
Devise a logical sequence for presenting these ideas. Remember that all of your ideas must support your central thesis. Platt, Kevin M, critical review of scientific paper.
Ivan the Terrible and Peter the Great, critical review of scientific paper. NOTE: Use the same bibliographic citation format as you would for any bibliography, works cited or reference list.
It will follow a standard documentation style such as MLA or APA. Be sure to ask your instructor which citation style to use. For frequently used style guides consult Queen's University Library's Citing Sources guide.
Ideally, you should leave your first draft for a day or two before revising. This allows you to gain a more objective perspective on your ideas. Check for the following when revising:. You may make major revisions in the organization or content of your review during the revision process.
Revising can even lead to a radical change in your critical review of scientific paper thesis. NOTE: Prepared by Critical review of scientific paper of Toronto Mississauga Library, Hazel McCallion Academic Learning Centre. Writing a Critical Review Allyson Skene, The Writing Centre, U of Toronto at Scarborough. The Book Review or Article Critique Margaret Procter, Writing Support, University of Toronto.
Critical Reviews of Journal Articles Herbert Coutts, University of Alberta. Writing a Critical Review The Writing Centre, Queen's University. Queen's University Library Critical review of scientific paper Guides 3 column Introduction to Research: Humanities and Social Sciences Critical Reviews. Search this Guide Search.
Introduction to Research: Humanities and Social Sciences. Popular Sources Scholarly vs. Non-Scholarly Periodicals Web Resources Writing Resources Critical Reviews Annotated Bibliography Reflective Writing Citing Sources Need Help?
Off Campus? Writing Critical Reviews What is a Critical Review of a Journal Article? Before You Read the Article What does the title lead you to expect about the article?
Study any sub-headings to understand how the author organized the content. Read the abstract for a summary of the author's arguments. Study the list of references to determine what research contributed critical review of scientific paper the author's arguments.
Are the references recent? Do they represent important work in the field? If possible, read about the author to learn what authority he or she has to write about the subject, critical review of scientific paper. Consult Web of Science to see if other writers have cited the author's work.
Please see 'How to use E-Indexes'. Has the author made an important contribution to the field of study? Reading the Article: Points to Consider Read the article carefully.
Record your impressions and note sections suitable for quoting. Who is the intended audience? What is the author's purpose? To survey and summarize research on a topic? To present an argument that builds on past research? To refute another writer's argument? Does the author define important terms? Is the information in the article fact or opinion? Facts can be verified, while opinions arise from interpretations of facts. Does the information seem well-researched or is it unsupported?
What are the author's central arguments or conclusions? Are they clearly stated? Are they supported by evidence and analysis? If the article reports on an experiment or study, does the author clearly outline methodology and the expected result? Is the article lacking information or argumentation that you expected to find? Is the article organized logically and easy to follow?
Does the writer's style suit the intended audience? Is the style stilted or unnecessarily complicated? Is the author's language objective or charged with emotion and bias? If illustrations or charts are used, are they effective in presenting information? Prepare an Outline Read over your notes. Write the First Draft The review should begin with a complete citation of the article. For example: Platt, Kevin M.
The first paragraph may contain: a statement of your thesis the author's purpose in writing the article comments on how the article relates to other work on the same subject information about the author's reputation or authority in the field The body of the review should: state your arguments in support of your thesis follow the logical development of ideas that you mapped out in your outline include quotations from the article critical review of scientific paper illustrate your main ideas The concluding paragraph may: summarize your review restate your thesis Revise the First Draft Ideally, you should leave your first draft for a day or two before revising.
Check for the following when revising: grammar and punctuation errors organization, logical development and solid support of your thesis errors in quotations or in references You may make major revisions in the organization or content of your review during the revision process, critical review of scientific paper. Additional Resources Writing a Critical Review Allyson Skene, The Writing Centre, U of Toronto at Scarborough The Book Review or Article Critique Margaret Procter, Writing Support, University of Toronto Critical Reviews of Journal Articles Herbert Coutts, critical review of scientific paper, University of Alberta Writing a Critical Review The Writing Centre, Queen's University.
Last Updated: Apr 7, AM Subjects: Multidisciplinary Print Page.
Critiquing a journal article
, time: 3:18(PDF) SAMPLE CRITICAL REVIEW | Yen Nguyen - blogger.com
CRITICAL EVALUATION OF A PUBLISHED PAPER The objective of this exercise is to evaluate your abilities to critically assess a published paper in Pharmacology. Each one of you will be given copies of the same publication. You will be expected to read the paper carefully and write a the last year, a number of poor papers have been submitted to the journal. Papers submitted to the journal are now reviewed using one of four check-lists, which are designed to evaluate papers that report either a research study or a review of the lit-erature or a systematic review or a case report. Instructions to authors and all four check A scientific literature review is a critical account of what has been published on a topic by accredited researchers. It may be: • A stand-alone assignment • An introduction to an essay, report, thesis, etc. • Part of research/grant proposals
No comments:
Post a Comment