Quantitative Article Critique: Review of the Literature example, a threat to both internal and external validity would be the sample selection process. The sample did not appear to come from a random selection process, which is a threat to internal validity. This flaw in the design caused an external threat to validity since the results Quantitative Research Article Review The quantitative research article that I chose to review was a study completed by Dougherty and Thompson (), found in Research in Nursing & Health. Very few researchers have focused their study on the impact of cardiac arrest and 14/2/ · Hire a subject expert to help you with Quantitative Article Review. $ for a 2-page paper. Hire verified expert. Using this tool, the author sought to find out to what degree teachers integrate technology into their classroom and into teaching and learning
Quantitative Article Review - blogger.com
Type of paper: Quantitative article review example Review. Topic: BreastfeedingStudyEvidenceEducationPracticeNursingExerciseHealth. Any type of paper on any subject custom-written for you by the professionals. Improving the quality of health care requires the utilization of evidence-based practice or guidelines, protocols, and interventions strongly quantitative article review example by research.
Doing so ensures that care is effective, efficient, and safe as well as consistent with ethical principles that uphold the rights of patients, quantitative article review example. Adopting evidence-based practices entails the process of research utilization that facilitates the transformation of knowledge and behaviors towards change.
The steps in the process include discovering primary research, summarizing the evidence, translating the evidence into guidelines, integrating the evidence into practice, and evaluating the outcomes Stevens, Research utilization applies in promoting exclusive breastfeeding during the first six months of life to achieve better outcomes for both mother and child as demonstrated in this paper.
The American Academy of Pediatrics and quantitative article review example World Health Organization recommend that infants be given breast milk only from birth up to 6 months to ensure their optimal growth, health, and development NICHHD, Based on observations, a lot of mothers do indeed breastfeed at delivery but at the 6-week visit, they are either no longer breastfeeding or alternating with formula.
The two articles focused on the factors influencing the duration of breastfeeding and the effectiveness of an intervention promoting exclusive breastfeeding, respectively. Hence, they were chosen to better understand the issue and possible solutions. Purpose The purpose of the systematic review by Castano and Ortiz was to summarize available evidence on the factors influencing how long new mothers provide exclusive breastfeeding to their babies.
On the other hand, the randomized-controlled trial RCT by Petrova et al. Thus, the RCT as a method of conducting primary research generates new knowledge, particularly to determine if a cause-and-effect relationship exists between the intervention and the selected outcomes.
The nature of the relationship between the study variables is the basis for conclusions on effectiveness. On the other hand, the systematic review gathers together the evidence from various RCTs and studies using other methodologies that fit the quantitative article review example established by the authors pertaining to the research problem, language used, and quality.
The output is not new knowledge but a synthesis of evidence that is useful in generating recommendations for practice.
The methods of the systematic review and the RCT also differ. The former began with a search and retrieval of peer-reviewed studies from 4 databases using defined search terms.
The third step was to evaluate the quality of the quantitative article review example studies. The CASPe critical reading program was used for this purpose. It is a software application that allows researchers to determine the trustworthiness of studies by answering 11 questions pertaining to the detail, results, quantitative article review example, and applicability of the results of each study, quantitative article review example.
Answers to the 11 questions correspond to a numeric score where the higher the score, the better the quality. Only those that scored 4 or more on the CASPe were included in the review as these were of moderate to high quality, quantitative article review example.
In the fourth step, the results were compared and contrasted the results to determine the protective factors and barriers to sustained exclusive breastfeeding.
Meta-analysis or pooling of the quantitative data was not possible because of heterogeneity in the studies. Meanwhile, the RCT which was done in a single center involved the recruitment of participants via quantitative article review example sampling with the sample size determined using power analysis. The participants were then allocated to the control or intervention group in a randomized process using a computer program.
Baseline data were obtained from all participants. Compliance with the breastfeeding recommendations quantitative article review example monitored. The control group received only routine care. exclusive breastfeeding, partial breastfeeding, or exclusive bottle feeding, were collected after the intervention. Because the two studies differed in terms of the research problem and methods, there were also differences in the results. On the other hand, multiparity, low family income, attaining high levels of education, and participation in a breastfeeding program were found to be promotive factors towards a longer length of time of exclusive breastfeeding.
Petrova et al. This means that while there was actual difference between the two groups with the women in the intervention group registering greater breastfeeding knowledge and reporting more positive behaviors, it was not significant enough to attribute the outcomes to the intervention. The lack of significant difference does not automatically mean that the intervention is totally ineffective and must be abandoned, however, because other RCTs have demonstrated effectiveness, quantitative article review example.
Rather, an RCT using a larger sample and with a better research design must be done to validate the findings. There are contradictions in the results of the two studies — the systematic review mostly based on descriptive studies linking participation in a breastfeeding program with longer durations of exclusive breastfeeding while the RCT found the breastfeeding program they investigated did not result in a similar finding. Also, the systematic review found that multiparity was a promotive factor, but this was not found to be so in the RCT.
In addition, quantitative article review example RCT did not find significant association between the duration of exclusive breastfeeding and the mode of delivery, rooming in, prior breastfeeding experiences, and return to work. Using the recommendations employed by the National Guidelines Clearinghouse, the systematic review is Level IIA evidence. This is because only 2 out of the 18 studies included in the review were clinical trials.
The rest were of descriptive methodologies - cross-sectional, cohort, and case and control studies. However, the trials were not randomized. In terms of grade, the systematic review is Grade B because the factors found to negatively or quantitative article review example affect breastfeeding duration are based directly on the results of the review which is Level II evidence.
As such, it can be used in practice. The grade of the evidence is different when considering the recommendation that breastfeeding programs must be designed and implemented targeting those who are found to have a greater tendency to not breastfeed exclusively for the first 6 months. In the systematic review, quantitative article review example, this included first-time mothers, those from higher income families, and those who are better education.
As this is an extrapolated recommendation from Level II evidence, it is Grade C. For this reason, support from other systematic reviews and other studies with a direct focus on this recommendation should be considered before its adoption in practice. The RCT which does not provide support for the effectiveness of the breastfeeding promotion program that was implemented is Level IB evidence and corresponds to Grade A.
Again, quantitative article review example, the grade changes when the recommendation that other factors such as culture which could impact patient learning, intent, and enactment of recommended breastfeeding behaviors should be considered when developing the content and method of delivery of breastfeeding education and lactation support.
In this case, the evidence is Grade B as it quantitative article review example extrapolated from Level I evidence. The systematic review included five studies conducted in developed countries — one in the US, two in Australia, one in the Netherlands, and one in Japan.
The others were conducted in third world settings such as Turkey, Brazil, and Colombia. Hence, these factors must be considered in the practice of promoting exclusive breastfeeding among new mothers.
With respect to other factors, the differences in social and cultural aspects as well as health care delivery systems warrant that the findings of studies done in the United States or at least in developed Western countries should shape practice.
Consideration of the negative and positive factors affecting the duration of breastfeeding identified in the literature, the specific patient population, and the individual patient adheres to the ethical principle of beneficence and distributive justice. The benefits of breastfeeding for the mothers and their infants regardless of their economic status, quantitative article review example, ethnicity, and other demographic characteristics are not optimized in the facility because of the absence of the lack of knowledge among the staff of the factors influencing the issue and the absence of EBP guidelines on how to improve exclusive breastfeeding rates.
The benefits in infants include lower rates of infection, adequate nutrition, improved survival during the first 12 months of life, lower risk of allergic diseases and type 1 diabetes, and better bonding with the mother NICHHD, In regards to the RCT, the lack of statistically significant findings means that the findings of other studies, especially systematic reviews, should be explored in order to determine best practices in the design and implementation of breastfeeding promotion that can be applied in practice.
Otherwise, practice recommendations cannot be made based only on the RCT used in this paper, quantitative article review example. Nevertheless, the study demonstrated how a breastfeeding promotion program can be designed and evaluated for effectiveness.
The facility can consider this information in conjunction with the findings of other studies as well as patient culture, quantitative article review example, values, and preferences thus employing a patient-centered approach that upholds beneficence and distributive justice. The evidence can prompt assessments of patient-specific factors hindering or promoting exclusive breastfeeding for the first 6 months after delivery. It also underscores the need for staff education and training on the importance of increasing exclusive breastfeeding rates, what works in terms of promoting this behavior, and the skills needed to teach or support new mothers in this aspect.
For example, the use of quantitative article review example and feeding bottles should not be encouraged. There must also be surveillance of outcomes to determine of practice changes improve infant and maternal outcomes.
The above elements can be integrated into a program in the maternity unit in coordination with homecare nurses conducting home visits. Further, technology can be used to increase awareness and compliance of the new policies. For instance, screensavers and prompts serve as reminders to assess patients while clinical support systems can provide readily available quantitative article review example that nurses can use in their decision making in regards to promoting exclusive breastfeeding.
Castano, J. Factors associated to the duration of exclusive breastfeeding. Investigacion Y Educacion En Enfermeria, 30 3 What are the benefits of breastfeeding? as px National Institute of Child Health and Human Development What are the recommendations for breastfeeding? aspx Petrova, A. Effectiveness of exclusive breastfeeding promotion in low-income mothers: A randomized controlled study.
Breastfeeding Medicine, 4 2 doi: Stevens, K. The impact of evidence-based practice in nursing and the next big thing. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 18 2. Please remember that this paper is open-access and other students can use it too. Some topics are tougher than others.
We use cookies to improve your experience with our site. Please accept before continuing or read our cookie policy here. Hire Writer. Good Article Review On Quantitative Article. Want a similar paper? Quantitative article review example can write it! Order now. New WowEssays Premium Database! Find the biggest directory of over 1 million paper examples!
Rationale for Choosing the Articles The American Academy of Pediatrics and the World Health Organization recommend that infants be given breast milk only from birth up to 6 months to ensure their optimal growth, health, and development NICHHD, Comparison of the Methods, Purpose, and Quantitative article review example Purpose The quantitative article review example of the systematic review by Castano and Ortiz was to summarize available evidence on the factors influencing how long new mothers provide exclusive breastfeeding to their babies.
Quantitative critique
, time: 15:02Quantitative Article Reviews for Undergraduate and Graduate Research Projects
14/2/ · Hire a subject expert to help you with Quantitative Article Review. $ for a 2-page paper. Hire verified expert. Using this tool, the author sought to find out to what degree teachers integrate technology into their classroom and into teaching and learning Quantitative Article Review Quantitative Article Reviews at the undergraduate and graduate level. The major purpose of writing a quantitative article review is to determine the validity of each study so that the value of the study findings in research practice can be evaluated. Custom quantitative article reviews are Paper Masters specialty, particulary in relation to graduate level research Example Of Research Paper On Nursing Nursing: Hypothermia Does Not Increase The Risk Of Infection: A Case Control Study – Research Papers Examples Term Paper On Sexual Harassment Good Literature Review About Psychoeducation In Management Of First Episode Psychosis Among Young Adults Conscientious Objection AND Nurses: A Literature Review On The Right To Refuse Care Literature Review
No comments:
Post a Comment